On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:31:07AM +0000, Jack Yu wrote: > [Mark] Given that the interrupt handler just schedules a work item there's no > need for it to be a threaded interrupt, it can just be a normal > interrupt and save the bother of masking the hardware interrupt and > running a thread. > Do you mean that it's not appropriate to use " queue_delayed_work" here, we should > use other method for handling work item ? No, when I said it shouldn't be a threaded interrupt I meant that using request_threaded_irq() doesn't seem appropriate.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
