Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sound: lpass-platform: Move dma channel allocation to pcmops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 14/06/16 13:49, Kenneth Westfield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:30:03AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Move dma channel allocations to pcmops open and close functions. Reason
to do this is that, lpass_platform_pcm_free() accesses snd_soc_pcm_runtime
via substream->private data, However By this time runtimes are already
freed as part of soc_cleanup_card_resources() sequence.

This patch moves the channel allocations/deallocations to pcmops open()
and close() respectively, where the code has valid snd_soc_pcm_runtime.

---
  sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
index db000c6..3bd2cd6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
+++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
@@ -61,7 +61,36 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcmops_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)

+		if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
+			pcm_data->rdma_ch = ch;
+			reg =  LPAIF_RDMACTL_REG(v, ch);

Spacing.
Ok, s/  / /

+		} else {
+			pcm_data->wrdma_ch = ch;
+			reg =  LPAIF_WRDMACTL_REG(v, ch);

Spacing.
Yep

+static int lpass_platform_pcmops_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
+{
+	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime = substream->private_data;
+	struct lpass_pcm_data *pcm_data = snd_soc_pcm_get_drvdata(soc_runtime);
+	struct lpass_data *drvdata =
+		snd_soc_platform_get_drvdata(soc_runtime->platform);
+	struct lpass_variant *v = drvdata->variant;
+	int ch;
+
+	if (v->free_dma_channel) {
+		if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
+			ch = pcm_data->rdma_ch;
+		else
+			ch = pcm_data->wrdma_ch;
+
+		if (ch >= 0)
+			v->free_dma_channel(drvdata, ch);
+	}

Since this is being moved from free() to close(), drvdata->substream[ch]
should be set to NULL.  Otherwise, the array could fill up as the PCM is
opened/closed.
Yep, we could do that.

@@ -471,14 +529,12 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime)
  	struct snd_pcm *pcm = soc_runtime->pcm;
  	struct snd_pcm_substream *psubstream, *csubstream;
  	struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = soc_runtime->cpu_dai;
-	struct lpass_data *drvdata =
-		snd_soc_platform_get_drvdata(soc_runtime->platform);
-	struct lpass_variant *v = drvdata->variant;
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	struct device *dev = soc_runtime->platform->dev;
  	struct lpass_pcm_data *data;
  	size_t size = lpass_platform_pcm_hardware.buffer_bytes_max;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;

-	data = devm_kzalloc(soc_runtime->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);

Is the reason for changing the dev pointer similar to why it was changed
for snd_dma_alloc_pages() below?
Yep, Only reason is that I can fit stuff in single line.

+		ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, dev, size,
+					  &psubstream->dma_buffer);
  		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(soc_runtime->dev,
-				"%s() error writing to rdmactl reg: %d\n",
-				__func__, ret);
-			goto capture_alloc_err;
+			dev_err(dev, "can't alloc playback dma buffer\n");

Print the return value.
Ok.

+		ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, dev, size,
+					  &csubstream->dma_buffer);
  		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(soc_runtime->dev,
-				"%s() error writing to wrdmactl reg: %d\n",
-				__func__, ret);
-			goto capture_reg_err;
+			dev_err(dev, "can't alloc capture dma buffer\n");

Ditto.
Ok.


Thanks,
srini
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux