Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] device property: Add function to search for named child of device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/9/2016 5:13 PM, Adam Thomson wrote:
For device nodes in both DT and ACPI, it possible to have named
child nodes which contain properties (an existing example being
gpio-leds). This adds a function to find a named child node for
a device which can be used by drivers for property retrieval.

For ACPI data node name matching, a helper function is also added
which returns false if CONFIG_ACPI is not set, otherwise it
performs a string comparison on the data node name. This avoids
using the acpi_data_node struct for non CONFIG_ACPI builds,
which would otherwise cause a build failure.

Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@xxxxxxxxx>

For some reason that didn't make it into the linux-acpi list, or at least I can't see it there.

---

Changes in v2:
  - Rebase to v4.7-rc1

  drivers/base/property.c  | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h  |  7 +++++++
  include/linux/acpi.h     |  6 ++++++
  include/linux/property.h |  3 +++
  4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
index f38c21d..573b361 100644
--- a/drivers/base/property.c
+++ b/drivers/base/property.c
@@ -888,6 +888,34 @@ struct fwnode_handle *device_get_next_child_node(struct device *dev,
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_next_child_node);

  /**
+ * device_get_named_child_node - Return first matching named child node handle
+ * @dev: Device to find the named child node for.
+ * @childname: String to match child node name against.
+ */
+struct fwnode_handle *device_get_named_child_node(struct device *dev,
+						  const char *childname)
+{
+	struct fwnode_handle *child;
+
+	/*
+	 * Find first matching named child node of this device.
+	 * For ACPI this will be a data only sub-node.
+	 */
+	device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
+		if (is_of_node(child)) {
+			if (!strcasecmp(to_of_node(child)->name, childname))

Why do you use strcasecmp() here?

+				return child;
+		} else if (is_acpi_data_node(child)) {
+			if (acpi_data_node_match(child, childname))
+				return child;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_named_child_node);
+
+/**
   * fwnode_handle_put - Drop reference to a device node
   * @fwnode: Pointer to the device node to drop the reference to.
   *
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 788c6c3..993bdd0 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -420,6 +420,13 @@ static inline struct acpi_data_node *to_acpi_data_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwn
  		container_of(fwnode, struct acpi_data_node, fwnode) : NULL;
  }

+static inline bool acpi_data_node_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+					const char *name)
+{
+	return is_acpi_data_node(fwnode) ?
+		(!strcasecmp(to_acpi_data_node(fwnode)->name, name)) : false;
+}

Is there any particular reason to introduce this function instead of doing the test in device_get_named_child_node() directly?

+
  static inline struct fwnode_handle *acpi_fwnode_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
  {
  	return &adev->fwnode;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 288fac5..03039c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -568,6 +568,12 @@ static inline struct acpi_data_node *to_acpi_data_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwn
  	return NULL;
  }

+static inline bool acpi_data_node_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+					const char *name)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
  static inline struct fwnode_handle *acpi_fwnode_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
  {
  	return NULL;
diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
index ecab11e..3a2f9ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/property.h
+++ b/include/linux/property.h
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ struct fwnode_handle *device_get_next_child_node(struct device *dev,
  	for (child = device_get_next_child_node(dev, NULL); child;	\
  	     child = device_get_next_child_node(dev, child))

+struct fwnode_handle *device_get_named_child_node(struct device *dev,
+						  const char *childname);
+
  void fwnode_handle_put(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);

  unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev);
--

Mika, Heikki, Andy, any feedback on this one?

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux