Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:43:20PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> You probably mean the BITCLK clock. > >> What is a bit pesky about this clock is that it can either be mastered by >> digital controller and the codec is a slave, or the other way around. > > That's a bit surprising - I've never encountered a system that > impelemnts this, it may be permitted by the spec but it's always the > CODEC. The master clock from the CODEC is often provided by the SoC but > I've not seen systems where anything other than the CODEC drives the > actual AC'97 bus. Ok, so let's assume a one direction. I'll have a look how I could add this clock to the probe() exactly as amba_probe() does. > It's not really adding anything though, it's just clumsy wording on > their part - it's not like we need to distinguish this from analogue > or any other type of AC'97 controllers. > >> Now if you prefer "ac97_controller" or something like that, that's as you wish, >> the name does not matter that much to me ;) > > Yes. Okay, let me add this to my todo list for v2. I already have suspend/resume/pm_suspend/pm_resume. Cheers. -- Robert _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
