On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:42:01 +0200,
Andreas x Larsson wrote:
>
> Under some usecases a race condition appears inside
> the snd_atomic_write_* functions. The 'begin' and 'end'
> variables are updated with the ++ operator which is not
> atomic but needs to be. This can be achieved with the
> gcc atomic_* built-ins. Combined with __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST
> as the memory model, memory barriers are introduced so
> those can also be removed from the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas x Larsson <andrelan@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arvid Nihlgård Lindell <arvidnl@xxxxxxxx>
Isn't this dependent on gcc version?
And, if we use the gcc atomic operation, the whole macros should be
rewritten in another way -- or consider to drop the whole. It's only
partly used in pcm_rate.c and pcm_plugin.c in anyway.
thanks,
Takashi
> ---
> alsa-lib/include/iatomic.h | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/alsa-lib/include/iatomic.h b/alsa-lib/include/iatomic.h
> index acdd3e2..7fafe20 100644
> --- a/alsa-lib/include/iatomic.h
> +++ b/alsa-lib/include/iatomic.h
> @@ -140,14 +140,12 @@ static __inline__ void
> snd_atomic_write_init(snd_atomic_write_t *w)
>
> static __inline__ void snd_atomic_write_begin(snd_atomic_write_t *w)
> {
> - w->begin++;
> - wmb();
> + __atomic_add_fetch(&w->begin, 1,__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> }
>
> static __inline__ void snd_atomic_write_end(snd_atomic_write_t *w)
> {
> - wmb();
> - w->end++;
> + __atomic_add_fetch(&w->end, 1, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> }
>
> static __inline__ void snd_atomic_read_init(snd_atomic_read_t *r,
> snd_atomic_write_t *w)
> --
> 2.1.4
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
