On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 03:19:14AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(uuid, tbl[i].uuid)) {
Do we really want to be working with UUIDs in string format all the
time? It seems error prone and as far as I can see at least some of the
time we get them in in binary format.
> + sprintf(buf, "%08X", entry->uuid.id_1);
> + sprintf(buf+strlen(buf), "-");
Coding style, spaces around +. I'd also like to be a bit more confident
that this can't result in a buffer overflow, sprintf() isn't reassuring
especially in conjunction with buf being passed in from elsewhere with
no length information.
> + adsp_hdr = (struct adsp_fw_hdr *)(buf + SKL_ADSP_FW_BIN_HDR_OFFSET);
> +
> + mod_entry = (struct adsp_module_entry *)
> + (buf + SKL_ADSP_FW_BIN_HDR_OFFSET + adsp_hdr->header_len);
> +
> + num_entry = adsp_hdr->num_module_entries;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_entry; i++, mod_entry++) {
> + get_canonical_uuid(uuid_str, mod_entry);
We're not checking that we're not walking off the end of the file here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
