Re: [PATCH V7 1/2] ASoC: core: add API for registering and cleaning up DMI card names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 04/06/2016 05:48 PM, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Hi,

On Apr 6 2016 16:29, han.lu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: "Lu, Han" <han.lu@xxxxxxxxx>

Add core API for registering and cleaning up DMI card names, so user
space utils such as PA and UCM can distinguish various products.
Previously on ASoC, the card short name, driver name and long name were
all the same as the machine driver name.
The patch adds more board information:
   card driver name     --->  machine driver name
   card short name      --->  DMI_BOARD_NAME or DMI_PRODUCT_NAME
   card long name and
   card component       --->  short name;driver name;(DMI_SYS_VENDOR,
                              optional);(the firmware name, optional)

Signed-off-by: Lu, Han <han.lu@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h
index 02b4a21..911d09e 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc.h
@@ -486,6 +486,9 @@ void snd_soc_runtime_deactivate(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int stream);
  int snd_soc_runtime_set_dai_fmt(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
  	unsigned int dai_fmt);
+int snd_soc_set_card_names(struct snd_soc_card *card, const char *firmware);
+void snd_soc_cleanup_card_names(struct snd_soc_card *card);
+
  /* Utility functions to get clock rates from various things */
  int snd_soc_calc_frame_size(int sample_size, int channels, int tdm_slots);
  int snd_soc_params_to_frame_size(struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params);
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index d2e62b15..c1f3520 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
(omit)
+/**
+ * snd_soc_cleanup_card_names() - cleanup registered DMI names
+ * @card: The card to cleanup
+ *
+ * This function cleanup the registered DMI names from card
+ */
+void snd_soc_cleanup_card_names(struct snd_soc_card *card)
+{
+	kfree(card->long_name);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_cleanup_card_names);
+
In linux kernel development, such a function with a little statements
tends to be 'static inline function' defined in a header, instead of
maintaining more symbols. I think some APIs of Linux workqueue are good
examples to you. See 'include/linux/workqueue.h'.

Thanks. Since we need to pass the string (firmware name) from machine
driver to core anyway, I guess one API is a must, but the cleanup API may
not necessary if there's no allocation. I'll rethink of it.

BR,
Han


Regards

Takashi Sakamoto
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel


_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux