On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 20:27 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > Okay catching up on this thread now.. > > So I don't think FW name would help, if required we should add dev_info > to print the firmware which is getting loaded. > > Now, since we have topology we should comprehend that as well. The > topology files essentially change the DSP graph and hence would required > different UCM settings so that should be added to name too. Same > hardware with different graph will need different settings.. > > And while thinking for it, I think it might be good to separate the SoC > and codec settings and in UCM setting for card specify the combination. > That may avoid duplicate codec setting all over the place for different > combination. I don't know if UCM supports that... That's the plan :) The intention is to make UCM machine specific rather than driver specific configuration. Han is going to add #include and #define like support to UCM in order to facilitate a library of codec UCM files that can be included into machine UCM configs. Liam > > Thanks _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
