On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 07:22:04PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Instead we should be probing at runtime (as the non-ASoC AC'97 code does) or > > something similar. > When you say "non-ASoC AC'97 code", which file are you referring to ? Is it > sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c ? Yes. > If so is there already a table of tuples (AC97_VENDOR_ID1, AC97_VENDOR_ID2) -> > (platform device, platform device data) and a matching mechanism already > available to the ASoC drivers ? ASoC doesn't really support the enumeration very well, you can use ac97.c as the CODEC but that's about it. There is a generic AC'97 PXA driver in sound/arm, if your system can use that that'd be a better route to DT integration for it I think. Did you try that, if there are problems with that perhaps we can improve that driver, it should be simpler.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
