On 02/17/2016 02:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:13:35AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> With this change we don't need to write custom machine drivers for setup not >> using sysclk_id == 0. >> I do think this is reasonable change by itself. > >> However I do think that the current simple-card is flawed regarding to clock >> selection and the change Jyri and me are proposing is reasonable. > > But you define a new ABI to specify it in the process, I'd rather fix > the flaws by using the common clock ABI than extend any device stuff. > If it didn't define a new ABI I'd probably not worry about it but one of > the issues we have with DT is that we do end up making ABIs every time > we put something in DT. I understand. This should have been supported by simple-card since the beginning. When we tried to move all boards to use simple-card, we hit the wall by not being able to select and configure other sysclk_id than 0. I don't want to create yet another simple card which handles only sysclk_id 1 ;) On the other hand this ABI is backwards compatible since if it is missing it will default to the configuration we right now have regarding to sysclk_dir and sysclk_id. I will look at the CCF implementation for McASP first then for aic3x. -- Péter _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel