On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:22:18 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This looks like a false-positive report to me. Of course, we should > >> > annotate the mutex there for nested locks, though. > >> > >> > >> Takashi, can you please annotate it for lockdep? I hit it on every run. > > > > The lock had an annotation but alas it didn't seem enough. > > In anyway, it's not good to have double locks if it's avoidable. So I > > worked on it now, and below is the current result of the hack. > > > > The change became a bit more intrusive than wished, but it should be > > still simple enough. I put this on top of topic/core-fixes branch. > > > I don't see the deadlock reports now. Thanks! Good to hear, now queued for the next pull request. Thanks for quick tests! Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
