On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:43:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added rt5659 codec driver unconditionally defines an
> ACPI device match table but then uses ACPI_PTR() to remove the
> only reference to it, so we get a harmless build warning:
> sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c:4200:30: warning: 'rt5659_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> static struct acpi_device_id rt5659_acpi_match[] = {
> This removes the ACPI_PTR() to avoid the warning.
Why is this a better fix than conditionally defining the table?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
