On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:05:30PM +0800, Mengdong Lin wrote: > On 12/10/2015 04:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >OK, but I do think that's something we *should* be doing as part of the > >overall move of CODECs to components and it's something that having this > >change implies we should be doing as an immediate thing since it's the > >more obvious direct use of the code (as Lars said in reply to the early > >draft you posted IIRC). > My early draft didn't use the aux components, so I'm not sure where to find > Lars's comments on this idea. He replied to some thing you posted by mistake and immediately retracted. Can't remember the subject, sorry. > Please check if my understanding is right? > I guess you want me to replace the "aux_dev" array from the struct > snd_soc_card, by an "aux_components" array. And we may > replace soc_bind_aux_dev() by soc_find_components(), > replace soc_probe/remove_aux_dev() by soc_probe/remove_components. > Probably soc_find/prove/remove_components need some adjustment for the the > aux devices (DAIless codecs). > And device driver of the these aux_dev need to use > snd_soc_register_component() to make it as a component. Yeah, pretty much. I think we'll have a period where we support both though as any CODEC *could* be used in this way and we're not ready for that yet. Let me have a look at converting some of the drivers over the weekend.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
