On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a > > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY. > > Other way around. > Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid on a MEMCPY channel. Arnd _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
