On Fri 2015-11-13 22:53:55, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:58:12PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Tue 2015-10-13 12:53:55, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:11:38PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > No, you definitely shouldn't be doing this - the regulator names should > > > > > reflect the names the device has in the datasheet to aid people in going > > > > > from software to the hardware and back again. They shouldn't be > > > > > dynamically generated at runtime. If you need to namespace by > > > > device > > > Ok. But I'd still like to get it working. > > So as I've been saying use the existing interfaces, or extend them as > needed. Obviously I'll need to use the existing interfaces, or extend them as needed. I'd expect subsystem maintainer to know if the existing interfaces are ok or what needs to be fixed, but it seems you either don't know how your subsystem works, or are not willing to tell me. Is there someone else I should talk to with respect to regulators-ALSA interface? Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
