On 11/11/2015 01:59 PM, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote: > >>> But that is precisely the problem. The framework that manages the >>> insertion and deletion of modules notes that my module has a usage count >>> that is > 0 (in my case it is 2, which I'm convinced is because the card >>> has been registered with ALSA), and refuses to free the module. So there >>> is now way any unregister_card call can be made when my module is freed, >>> as due to the usage count it would never even be attempted. >> >> Do you mean that unbind is never called? Well, the framework should call >> bind/unbind for each user of your module. > > Ok, I didn't know that. It's the first time I've been writing an ALSA > driver as a loadable module. > >> How is your architecture? If you use one card for each probe of module >> then each bind should create one device, right? > > In this case, it is a device which is located on the SoC. There is only > one instance of it. When the module is loaded, it loads a codec driver > with its associated DAI driver, a PCM driver, snd-soc-dummy-dai, and then > a machine driver to tie it all together, finally registering the card with > ALSA. > > Looking in /sys/bus/platform/devices, there seems to be one device created > for the codec itself, and one for the machine driver. I don't know if > that's right or wrong, the ALSA driver hierarchy works in the sense that I > can capture audio from it anyway. Which one is the module you can't unload? The module that contains the machine driver should only have its reference count increment when a playback or capture stream is active so you can't remove it when it is actively in use. - Lars _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel