Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: fix missing machine device creation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:27:08PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:24:58AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between this and what's
> > going on in sst-acpi.  They seem to be doing the same thing in slightly
> > different ways, they both match tables of CODEC IDs to machine driver
> > names with the distinction being that this doesn't provide a firmware
> > filename whereas sst-acpi does but the mechanics of mapping a CODEC to a
> > machine driver seem otherwise the same.

> I don't disagree with your observation, the code does same stuff and only
> difference is the data we require here, so commonizing becomes tricky

The only difference in data appears to be a firmware file name?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux