On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:29:02PM +0800, Keyon wrote: > >I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between this and what's > >going on in sst-acpi. They seem to be doing the same thing in slightly > >different ways, they both match tables of CODEC IDs to machine driver > >names with the distinction being that this doesn't provide a firmware > >filename whereas sst-acpi does but the mechanics of mapping a CODEC to a > >machine driver seem otherwise the same. > > agree that it may be better if we can reuse(or merge with) sst > driver (intel/common/sst-acpi.c) for SKL. all drivers use different sst_machine structure... and data required is not same -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
