On 28/10/15 01:04, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:55:27PM +0000, Damien Horsley wrote: >> On 23/10/15 23:57, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Shouldn't we be doing that flush on stream close instead? If nothing >>> else the flush is going to discard a bit of data if the stream is just >>> paused. > >> The FIFOs are only 8 frames in size, so I am not sure there is an >> issue with these frames being lost. > >> I think it also makes sense to keep the blocks consistent with each >> other. The spdif (out and in), and parallel out, all flush automatically >> when stopped, and the fifo for the i2s out block is cleared when the >> reset is asserted. > > This seems like an issue that got missed in the other drivers then. I'd > expect the trigger operation to be a minimal operation which starts and > stops the data transfer, not doing anything else. > The spdif out, spdif in, and parallel out blocks auto-flush whenever they are stopped. It is not possible for software to prevent this behavior. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
