On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:44 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > That one needs a bit more taste and thought to work out what's > > appropraite than can be guaranteed easily with a script, things like > > working out drive level prefixes for example. > [perfectly useful git applypatch-msg hook script removed] No, it really isn't. Have you tried looking at the output? It's not going to do the right thing for the subject line here for example, never mind any other cases. > > No, that's going to leave essentially every commit that needs fixing up > > still needing manual fixup. > Then I'm sure that's your job as a maintainer > to modify whatever patches you get to suit your > taste. One of the things I'd really expect that a frequent submitter of trivial patches would be doing is to make an effort to improve the quality of what is being sent. If it's at the point where you're sending a lot of patches and it's more effort to apply them than to review them there's a problem. This is something that generally causes no problems for submitters...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
