On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:22:49 +0200 Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For sure we need to have the card level DAPM map, when we have more than one > codec in the system. > What I was thinking is more like to move the DAPM map from codec domain up to > card level. > What I mean is, that when you build up your ASoC card, the DAPM map/routes are > going to be attached to the card, and not to the codec. Actually paths and widgets are already decoupled from codec and moved to card domain. Map/route is initialization time thing which still has dependency to codec. I.e. snd_soc_dapm_add_route favors a widget from a calling dapm context (codec). This is due if there are machines with multiple codecs that are not cross-connected but if they have widgets with a same name and I didn't want to force them to use name prefixing and thus causing userspace-kernel space breakage (kcontrol names changed) compared to current implementation. -- Jarkko _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
