On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 17:25 +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > In alc5623_i2c_probe(), > the default case for checking alc5623->id behaves the same as case 0x23. > However, In alc5623_probe() the default case for checking alc5623->id > becomes to be the same as case 0x21. > This makes the meaning of default case inconsistent. > > Since we have checked codec id in alc5623_i2c_probe() by comparing > vid2 with id->driver_data, it is not possible to run into the default case now. > > In case we may add more supported devices to alc5623_i2c_table in the future, > this patch changes the default case return -EINVAL to let people know that > they should not run into this case. They should also add a new case accordingly > for the new id. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
