On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:12 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Alexander <subaparts@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does anyone really have success experience with SPI codecs with new > > name-based SOC API? > > There are really few SPI codecs in ASoC subsystem, so I wonder if only I > > cannot bind my SPI codec to machine driver. > > > > The codec is registered with name spi0.0 it's the behavior of SPI > > subsystem, I suppose. So the form is %s%d.%d and not %s.%d as supposed > > in fmt_single_name() in soc_core.c > > > Have you managed to bind the SPI codec? I am trying the same thing > here. Please let me know. I've received a reply from Dimitris Papastamos, SoC subsystem developer, and he written, that I should use it as is, ie spi0.0 So I'm finished with names and successfully binded it as codecname==spi0.0 But for now, I have no sound anyway, it seems that something in SPI path is broken (but I suppose, not in my code, as it works on 2.6.36-rc6), I cannot see any communications going to codec with oscilloscope. So I'm trying to figure it out now... Best regards, Alexander A. Sverdlin. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
