Re: usage of SOC_ENUM_SINGLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:48:49PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote:

> static const struct snd_kcontrol_new intel_msic_snd_controls[] = {	
> SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(OUTEN, 0x43, 0x40, headset_switch_text),
> };

> Would this be the right thing, I am interpreting that 0x40 will be written for 
> earpiece in above and 0x3 for headset

No, that will cause you to have an enumeration with 0x40 elements
starting at bit 0x43 in the register.  You're looking for a
SOC_VALUE_ENUM, not a SOC_ENUM - SOC_ENUM covers contiguous ranges of
values in the enumeration.

Note also that you should namespace the #defines for your register
names.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux