On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:23 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> We call snd_soc_register_dais() in sh4_soc_dai_probe(),
> thus we should call snd_soc_unregister_dais() in sh4_soc_dai_remove().
>
> Otherwise, we got "too many arguments to function 'snd_soc_unregister_dai'"
> error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/sh/ssi.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c
> index 40bbdf1..05192d9 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int __devinit sh4_soc_dai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int __devexit sh4_soc_dai_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - snd_soc_unregister_dai(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(sh4_ssi_dai));
> + snd_soc_unregister_dais(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(sh4_ssi_dai));
> return 0;
> }
>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
