On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:37:22PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: > >> Â Â Â Â SND_SOC_SMDK_SPDIF -> ASOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_SPDIF >> Â Â Â Â SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8580 -> ASOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8580 >> Â Â Â Â SND_SOC_SMDK_WM9713 -> ASOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM9713 >> Â Â Â Â SND_SOC_GONI_AQUILA_WM8994 -> ASOC_GONI_AQUILA_WM8994 > > Hrm. ÂThese ones I'm not entirely happy about - we're pretty > consistently using SND_SOC_ rather than ASOC_ throughout the subsystem > so changing to ASOC_ feels like churn. ÂIs there any great reason for > the rename? ÂI don't mind the addition of SAMSUNG_ one way or the other, > it's just the subsystem prefix. If SND_SOC is to be used across all platforms, my changes are indeed out of line. Otherwise, ASOC represents SND_SOC better and compactly. > I've applied this just now as the rename patch depends on it. Ok, though I was/am willing to submit yet another revision. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
