On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:28 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:46:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower. > > > > Some aren't consistent. (Staging/staging) > > > Case usually doesn't matter to most of us. > > Given that we're working in case sensitive languages here it's probably > > safe to assume that a reasonable proportion of people will care; being > > reasonably consistent with existing practice for the subsystem seems > > sensible. > Greg takes patches that say STAGING or Staging or staging. Greg seems to rewrite patch subjects and is inconsistent about case, so he might be doing that by hand. > DaveM takes patches that say net: or netdev: or network: or NET: DaveM doesn't appear to be choosy about patch subject lines. He seems to take any sensible patch and as far as I know he doesn't edit the subject lines. He does reject inferior patches outright. > The sound maintainers take patches that say sound: or alsa: or ALSA: The sound maintainers seem to rewrite patch subjects on an ad-hoc basis. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
