On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:06:37PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > This sounds feasible change. What I was thinking are there any > benefit which one, the register or codec is compared first but I don't > think there's any practical difference. > A1, B1, A2, B2 (now) > or > A1, A2, B1, B2 (codec comparison before register) If you've got two identical CODECs it will *probably* sound smoother to alternate between the two rather than enabling one then the other - there will be less time difference between any audible issues in each path. Probably a very small chance of that having an effect but it seemed more likely to do something useful than any other scenario. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
