On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:23:26AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> list_for_each_entry_safe(w, n, list, power_list) {
> ret = 0;
>
> /* Do we need to apply any queued changes? */
> - if (sort[w->id] != cur_sort || w->reg != cur_reg) {
> + if (sort[w->id] != cur_sort || w->reg != cur_reg ||
> + w->dapm != cur_dapm) {
> if (!list_empty(&pending))
> - dapm_seq_run_coalesced(dapm, &pending);
> + dapm_seq_run_coalesced(cur_dapm, &pending);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pending);
> cur_sort = -1;
> cur_reg = SND_SOC_NOPM;
We need a corresponding change in dapm_seq_compare() to ensure that the
widgets for a given card are grouped together. I'll send out some
patches to do that shortly since I just noticed there's an oversight
there anyway.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
