Thanks for pointing out the I2C device ID. After looking at the existing drivers that have multiple I2C IDs, I see that the devices can be uniquely identified. With this we should be able to accommodate both devices with the same driver. On 11/11/2010 03:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:21:07PM -0600, Jesse Marroquin wrote: >> This patch adds the initial driver for the MAX98089 CODEC. > > I've not read this properly yet but on a first quick scan through this > bears a more than passing resemblance to the MAX98088 driver - are there > sufficient incompatibilities between the chips to warrant having a > separate driver? http://datasheets.maxim-ic.com/en/ds/MAX98088.pdf > would suggest not... > > Keeping a single driver means less code to maintain, which is generally > a win. Variations between the parts can be accommodated by registering > different controls and so on based on the I2C device ID that the system > registers. > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
