On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:00:06AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote: > I think we need to consider non CODEC components too that have DAPM > controls (and have no CODEC mutex). i.e OMAP4 ABE. > I'll try and look into this later as part of the OMAP4 upstream. Ideally > a card/DAPM mutex may be more desirable here. Another option is to just move the mutex up to the card level so we don't need mutexes on the individual objects. I think we're going to need to lock at the card level to do cross-object DAPM sequences, and if we do that we may not need to bother with anything more fine grained. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
