On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:12:15PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My main thought with this now that I see the change is that it'd be > > easier and probably clearer to add an explicit list of devices rather > > than to repurpose the DAI links. This will probably be simpler since we > > can avoid things like having to work out if we've seen and initialised a > > device before when it has multiple DAIs involved. > My concern was mostly that we end up having somewhat similar struct > than snd_soc_dai_link and adding pointer to such table in snd_soc_card. We probably want to be pulling stuff out of the DAI link if anything (for example, the CODEC is generally going to be implied by the CODEC DAI). > But that's not necessary reduncandy at all if it makes cleanier move to > other cases like codec-codec etc. I'll experiment that in next version. Please do - I'd rather have a series of small, clear descriptive lists than a single big list since I think that this will be much clearer and easier to work with. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
