On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:03:10 -0700
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:02:22PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>
> > Functions dapm_seq_run and dapm_seq_run_coalesced are modified so that a new
> > write is issued when the sequence extends to an another device and DAPM
> > context of a widget instead of originating DAPM context is used when doing
> > pop waits and register writes.
>
> I'm having a hard time parsing this bit of the changelog, I'm afraid.
> What I'd expect is that the comparison operation used for coalescing
> would be extended to compare based on the CODEC/DAPM context too and the
> split per device should naturally fall out of that. I didn't notice the
> comparison being updated?
>
It was these diffs for dapm_seq_run:
/* Do we need to apply any queued changes? */
- if (sort[w->id] != cur_sort || w->reg != cur_reg) {
+ if (sort[w->id] != cur_sort || w->reg != cur_reg ||
+ w->dapm != cur_dapm) {
if (!list_empty(&pending))
dapm_seq_run_coalesced(dapm, &pending);
So if DAPM is different the dapm_seq_run_coalesced is run now and next
iterations are done for another DAPM context.
Looking at this now I think I can leave out dapm_seq_run_coalesced
changes by changing the line above to
dapm_seq_run_coalesced(cur_dapm, &pending). I'll check it for the
next version.
> Otherwise this looks pretty good, these are stylistic things:
>
Good notes. I'll change them.
--
Jarkko
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
