On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:54:17AM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote: > In user space snprintf() returns negative on errors but the kernel > version only returns positives. It could potentially return sizes I'm not going to apply this. snprintf() returns a signed type, checking that the return value is a reasonable thing to do here - at worst we're wasting a few cycles in code that's nowhere near a hot path, at best we're robust in the face of a decision to add error reporting to snprintf() so it's hard to see this change as an improvement. > larger than the size of the buffer so we should check for that. > - if (ret >= 0) > - ret = simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos, buf, ret); > + if (ret > PAGE_SIZE) > + ret = PAGE_SIZE; > + > + ret = simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos, buf, ret); The PAGE_SIZE part of the change has an issue too, the code immediately preceeding this is: list_for_each_entry(codec, &codec_list, list) ret += snprintf(buf + ret, PAGE_SIZE - ret, "%s\n", codec->name); so it's rather late to be worrying about PAGE_SIZE after the loop. Please also try to be a bit more thoughtful in your use of get_maintainers; try to have a look at why people have come up and consider if it's really sensible to include them. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
