Re: ASoC updates for 2.6.37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:30 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Yeah, I do understand the initial intention, but size_t for such a
> case (just for an index of a small fixed size array) is obviously too
> much.  If it must be size_t, it shouldn't be a variable name like "i"
> but a more specific name.

I see your point. Makes sense.

Cheers,
Dimitrios

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux