On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:30 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Yeah, I do understand the initial intention, but size_t for such a > case (just for an index of a small fixed size array) is obviously too > much. If it must be size_t, it shouldn't be a variable name like "i" > but a more specific name. I see your point. Makes sense. Cheers, Dimitrios _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel