On 09/25/2010 01:47 PM, Matthew Dharm wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:51:56PM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> On 09/24/2010 05:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:08:56PM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote: >>>> The below patch, is a simple fix to a broken web address not using a >>>> period in it's >>>> name. I'll leave this up to you guys if you want to use it... >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> I'll queue it up, thanks. >>> >>> Oh, it's "staging", not "stagging" as you have up there in the Subject: >>> :) >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >> >> shoot... and I actually changed it from staging to stagging thinking >> that was correct..(duh).. >> >> Anyways alright.. I'll exclude this one if the other sets get finalized. > > One random suggestion: Perhaps you should include a date here? i.e. "URL > blah blah blah (as of Sept 2010)" > > That way, people have some idea how much they can trust that URL without > having to dig into the kernel history to see when it was last changed. > > Matt > well.. as it stand right now doing grep -Re "http" in all the directories(minus COPYING/MAINTAINERS) gave me a little over 2000 addresses to check(not so bad, only a few days worth of checking(finding the broken address is time consuming)).. so I could go back and do this for all of them except the webarchive addresses that are broken(maybe put a tag on them saying use_webarchive or something). then there is the question of how much more bloated will the kernel get with such a thing(I'm guessing not much, but then again you never know). Justin P. Mattock _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
