On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:12:52AM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > Fwiw, the reason for the "-codec" suffix was to distinguish codec > devices from their other multi-function IC siblings. It also makes sense Yes, MFDs do need something to distinguish them. > here to use convention with the device naming too (even if the device is > single purpose). I don't find it adds much more than making the name longer to type - we always use the name in a context where it's fairly obvious that the device is a CODEC. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
