El jue, 02-09-2010 a las 10:29 +0200, Takashi Iwai escribió: > Rejected by SPF lookup: (recv=llar.net.uniovi.es, > send-ip=195.135.220.2) Could not find a valid SPF record > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 > (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 > (HANACHIRUSATO) > References: <1283357723.8159.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > At Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:15:23 +0200, > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > This is an old problem I am suffering since kernel-2.6.32 and that is > > still unresolved even with 2.6.35 and alsa-utils-1.0.23: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31422.html > > > > If you follow the thread, it got stalled in: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31433.html > > > > In summary, I get the following: > > # alsactl -f /etc/asound.state restore /dev/snd/controlC0 > > Unknown hardware: "VIA8237" "Realtek ALC658D" "AC97a:414c4781" "0x147b" > > "0x1415" > > Hardware is initialized using a guess method > > # echo $? > > 99 > > This is no error. It means that alsactl has no special workaround > for your hardware. The return code of alsactl looks strange. > I thought Jaroslav has already fixed it, though... > > > Takashi > Well, Jaroslav fixed it to use "99" instead of "157": http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31430.html And, about the message, could it be reworded for preventing to make users think their hardware is "Unknown"? Maybe it could simply show "No workaround needed for: ..." instead of "Unknown hardware" Thanks :-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
