On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 15:45 +0200, ext Mark Brown wrote:
> > My mail was meant as a friendly remainder, I've more used to get replies
> > like: "thanks for reminding me"...
>
> A friendly reminder if it looks like things have been forgotten is one
> thing, but a reminder after less than 24 hours doesn't come over as
> that.
>
> > But I sent the version five of the codec on the fifth of August and got
> > no comments to that either and then I sent version six just because I
> > had had a change to test it. So for me it was almost two weeks, which
> > still perfectly fine... I just sent that message with I thought was
> > perfectly unoffensive.
>
> You got comments on v5 - both Liam and myself replied to your v5 posting
> reminding you to update for multi-component.
We might as well have the facts right:
Above you are talking about v3 because v4 was the first multi component
version:
And to that you (Mark) commented:
> This basically looks OK but...
>
> > +/* codec private data */
> > +struct wl1273_priv {
> > + struct snd_soc_codec codec;
> > + enum wl1273_mode mode;
> > + struct wl1273_core *core;
> > + unsigned int channels;
> > +};
>
> ...why would anything outside the driver be peering > into this?
Then I sent v5 (on 5 of Aug) to which I got no comment, then I sent v6
after being able to test the codec... And be because I hadn't heard you
in 13 days I wrote the unfortunate phrase: "I haven't heard you in a
while"... Which I meant as a form a small talk and of course as way to
get attention, which I got...
Thanks,
Matti.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
