On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The lack of shared soc data in device trees is indeed a problem that > has been on my radar for a while now. Fortunately I do have a > solution[1] which is partially implemented plus a contractual > obligation to deliver it to a client in the near future. I fully > expect this will become a non-issue between now and about mid > November. > > g. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00680.html I haven't read through all of it, but it looks like your solution affects only DTS files. I think Mark's concern is mostly with DTB files, because we still need to have a unique DTB for every possible board variation. Am I reading that correctly? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
