On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:59:49AM -0400, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > No, just stomping over the variable to shut up the warning doesn't > > improve anything at all. You need to make sure that the compiler can > > actually follow the control flow to see that the data is always > > initialised rather than disabling the check and missing any actual > > issues. > I did, hence the comment in the commit that the variable is > initialized by fll_factors(). You're completely missing the point here. What I said was that you need to make sure that the *compiler* can actually follow the control flow. You've not done that, you've stomped over the warning to shut both this and any valid warnings related to the structure up. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
