On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:09:10PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On Tuesday 03 August 2010 11:39:44 ext Mark Brown wrote: > > I think there's something useful we can do with DAPM here (independantly > > of anything in TWL4030), probably involving splitting up the routing > > change walk to run power down first and then power up but the current > > patch feels like it's going to cause at least as many problems as it > > solves. > I tend to agree. The patch for the core is quite dramatic change, and it can > introduce other types of problems. > But... It would make the actual register write sequence consistent in all cases. The power and route configuration settings aren't really part of the same sequence, though - other widgets can also trigger power changes, and obviously a route change need not imply a power change. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
