At Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:07:31 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:31:16 +0200, > > David Henningsson wrote: > >> > >> Hi Takashi, > >> > >> Do you plan to make hda-verb, hda-analyzer, hda-emu and/or codecgraph a > >> part of alsa-tools/alsa-utils/pyalsa in the future? > >> > >> I'm asking because I would like to know if it makes sense to package > >> them separately for Debian. > > > > I can put hda-emu to alsa-tools if anyone wants. > > This is a really small code. (But I didn't put it because I didn't > > want to 100 times bigger auto-tools stuff for it :) > > > > But, hda-emu doesn't suit with alsa-tools category. It's a tool to > > be built with the latest (or the version to be tested) sound kernel > > tree. So, it's not much worth to package. > > > > hda-analyzer is already in alsa.git. I guess it depends on Jaroslav. > > What about an idea to move all hda related stuff to new git repository > like alsa-hda-tools ? It will make packaging more easy with uniform > name and developers will find all recent stuff at one place. Well, hda-emu shouldn't be packaged together, so I'd like to keep it separately. So, what else? hda-verb and hda-analyzer? hda-verb hasn't been updated since long time ago :) Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
