Re: linux vs c99 fixed width types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:28:51 +0100,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:13:26PM +1200, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> 
> > Currently HW32 is translated into u32 before I submit patches to you.
> > Should I do the same for the C99 types, or let them pass through unaltered?
> 
> Linux standard is to use u32 and friends rather than the C99 types.

Yes, I also prefer u32 and co unless they must be C99 types
(e.g. exported and shared with user-space).


thanks,

Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux