On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:30:13PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > At this stage, we're just looking at how to structure device in the device > tree. The bindings for specific devices will come as required (ie, as we add > device tree support for them). Actually, re-reading the page I'm not sure it really captures my understanding of the discussion (and all the previous discussions we've had on the lists and so on) at all. Reading the page the idea that a machine specific driver is normal and expected doesn't come over at all well, especially in the design section which doesn't make any mention at all of machine specific drivers. As I keep saying the main thing I'm looking for from any device tree binding is something that I can point people at so we don't need to go through the rehashings of this subject which come up every time someone decides they want to use device trees. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
