On 8 Jun 2010, at 20:27, Ryan Mallon wrote: > Okay, I have Liam and Hartley's acks on this one and Liam's on 3/3. > Mark, do you want to apply the other two patches to your tree, or should > they go via the arm tree? I don't urgently mind for patch 1 since there's no build time dependency - in order to avoid possible merge issues in the ARM tree it's as well if it goes that way, though I can pick it up if it makes sense for you guys to keep stuff together and you don't anticipate colliding with any work in the arch/arm code for the CPU. Patch 3 I'll apply to ASoC tomorrow, it depends on the I2S driver for the CPU which is most definitely ASoC (and it's going to get caught up in the multi-CODEC API changes soon as well so would get build issues in -next if merged via a different tree anyway). _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
