On 2 June 2010 22:29, John Lindgren <john.lindgren@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > In a multi-threaded application it is possible for snd_pcm_delay or an > equivalent function to be called by one thread while another is sitting > in snd_pcm_writei. In this case, snd_pcm_delay does not take into > account that there may not be enough space for all the data passed to > snd_pcm_writei to be written to the ring buffer at once, and will return > incorrect values. > I believe the definition of snd_pcm_delay() is it returns a value that would be fairly accurate at this instance of time. If you followed the snd_pcm_delay() with a snd_pcm_writei(), the samples would reach the speaker "delay" time later. I think it would be fair to say that the value of snd_pcm_delay() is undefined if called during a snd_pcm_writei() call, because you will get a return value from snd_pcm_delay() but you will have no idea how many samples of the current snd_pcm_writei() have been written and thus no idea what the delay will be on the next snd_pcm_writei(). Even in multi-threaded applications calling two functions at the same time that interfere with each other it not good. If a function is re-entrant it is generally considered to be thread safe. It does not necessarily mean that it is sensible to call two different functions at the same time. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
