On Tuesday 01 June 2010 09:38:07 ext Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:57:22 +0300
>
> Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Monday 31 May 2010 13:00:21 ext Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > +static int hw_rule_bsize_by_channels(struct snd_pcm_hw_params
> > > > *params, + struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *rule)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct snd_interval *bs = hw_param_interval(params,
> > > > + SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_BUFFER_SIZE);
> > > > + struct snd_interval *c = hw_param_interval(params,
> > > > + SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS);
> > >
> > > Best to make these variable names more meaningful.
> >
> > Sure, I can change that. I have picked these, since all code, which adds
> > hw_rule (and the writing an ALSA driver manual) are using variables like
> > this. In Here I mean:
> > bs == Buffer Size
> > c == Channels
>
> Change also function names. They should start with omap_mcbsp_.
>
> hw_rule_bsize_by_channels
> hw_rule_psize_by_channels
> ->
> omap_mcbsp_(calc_max_bufsize, rule_max_buf, or something)
> omap_mcbsp_(calc_max_periodsize)
Oh yes, they should start with omap_mcbsp_
I'll change them too.
I like the following naming:
omap_mcbsp_hwrule_min_buffersize()
omap_mcbsp_hwrule_max_periodsize()
Also, I think there is no point to limit the lower period size in threshold mode
to 32, so I will remove that as well I think.
I'll wait couple of hours for comments, and resend the series.
Thanks,
Péter
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
