On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:26 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 26 April 2010 20:13:47 ext Liam Girdwood wrote: > > > > Everything is just carrying on as before except the upstream management > > effort is being divided between Mark and I. i.e. I'll manage the TI/OMAP > > based patches, Mark will manage the rest. > > I see, it make sense. > Are we continuing the practice that in case of OMAP (McBSP) patches Jarkko > or/and I have to ack it in order to be accepted? > I'm also the maintainer for the twl4030 ASoC codec driver (see MAINTAINERS > file)... Yes, nothing has changed here. :) > > Patch submitters should not notice any difference as both trees are > > based on Takashi's ASoC branch and are regularly kept up to date. > > Just to clarify it: You and Mark will send pull request to Takashi, yes > or is it > going to be You -> Mark -> Takashi route? and yes. Depending on workload, any merge issues, cross tree patches etc. Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
