On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:13:47 +0100 Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't see a need for own tree for plain sound/soc/omap/ patches but > > this could makes sense for patches that touch also arch/arm/ (we have > > had a few cases) or sounc/soc/codec/ (if we ever have such a need?). > > > > This is not a cross tree merge branch or OMAP patch dumping area. > > Everything is just carrying on as before except the upstream management > effort is being divided between Mark and I. i.e. I'll manage the TI/OMAP > based patches, Mark will manage the rest. > Yeah, thanks for clarifying. Makes sense to me. I was kind of fearing that are we creating some patch dumping area :-) -- Jarkko _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
